[3.7] bpo-33947: dataclasses no longer can raise RecursionError in repr (GF9916)#9970
Merged
ericvsmith merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from Oct 19, 2018
Merged
Conversation
…9916) The reprlib code was copied here instead of importing reprlib. I'm not sure if we really need to avoid the import, but since I expect dataclasses to be more common that reprlib, it seems wise. Plus, the code is small. (cherry picked from commit dd13c88) Co-authored-by: Srinivas Thatiparthy (శ్రీనివాస్ తాటిపర్తి) <srinivasreddy@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@srinivasreddy and @ericvsmith: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
@srinivasreddy and @ericvsmith: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
|
@ericvsmith: Please replace |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The reprlib code was copied here instead of importing reprlib. I'm not sure if we really need to avoid the import, but since I expect dataclasses to be more common that reprlib, it seems wise. Plus, the code is small.
(cherry picked from commit dd13c88)
Co-authored-by: Srinivas Thatiparthy (శ్రీనివాస్ తాటిపర్తి) srinivasreddy@users.noreply.github.com
https://bugs.python.org/issue33947